I’m down like a clown for this
Welcome to Talking Time's third iteration! If you would like to register for an account, or have already registered but have not yet been confirmed, please read the following:
Once you have completed these steps, Moderation Staff will be able to get your account approved.
TT staff acknowledge that there is a backlog of new accounts that await confirmation.
Unfortunately, we are putting new registrations on hold for a short time.
We do not expect this delay to extend beyond the first of November 2020, and we ask you for your patience in this matter.
~TT Moderation Staff
On Twitter, Logan78106803 inquired of Gunn:
Gunn defended his decision, referencing the real-world dog Laika who was one of the first animals in space:“Why did you make cosmo a female when he had always been known as a good boy”
Notgoingsane also tweeted their views on the situation:“Because Cosmo is based on Laika, the Russian dog, who was a female, so I gender-swapped her back.”
In his reply, James Gunn namedropped other Guardians characters, such as Drax and Mantis, who he modified from their comic versions:“But it makes no sense why to change it. Keeping it wasn't inaccurate as the comic is a male dog It serves no purpose to change it. The original comic was a male dog you are not 'changing it back' because it was never a female in the first place. Only inspired by.”
That same Twitter user doubled down on their complaint:“I’d rather honor the real dog who died in outer space. Cosmo would not exist without Laika. By the way, I changed Mantis, Drax, High Evo, and others from humans to aliens, which seems a bigger change. Why does it upset you so much?“
And Gunn had none of it:“Because the whole point of an adaptation is to adapt. You adapt the source material as I stated. And I hate comics changing established characters as well (unless they state its a multiverse thing. )”
“It’s always a multiverse thing. That’s what the MCU is - a different version of Earth 616. And, again, you should look up the meaning of ‘adapt.’“
Are you saying a woman can't have Boris Badinovs' voice?It does fly in the face of me reading all of Cosmos dialogue in Boris Badinovs voice, however
They just want to be able to call Cosmo a good boy, for as we all know there is no equivalent term for female dogsJust imagine how mad they'll be when they find out that half of all dogs in real life are female. The feminists are taking over!!
It’s more than that. They allow this limp-wristed version of dissent so rubes can be like oh they mustn’t be all that bad because this and this. But that’s just a cheap way to buy easy cred. It’s the Fox News model of having a blubbering and impotent “liberal” sit across Hannity for years so that they can pretend they’re “fair and balanced”.I think Disney is so monolithic as a corporation that they just don't care. Where else are you going to go for comic book movies that meet an acceptable standard of quality and Star Wars sequels? I think Tim Burton's unnecessary live-action Dumbo was built around criticism of theme parks like Disneyland. As long as the films don't say "Don't go to Disneyland specifically, it really sucks ass... go to Cedar Point instead," I think Iger just shrugs it off. Gunn is just gumming the hand that feeds him.
Not sure I love Mantis just casually erasing Drax's memory. The scene establishes that she loves him and it's meant to protect his feelings, but it feels like another case of Mantis escaping the consequences of her actions.
My only complaint really, and it’s not one I usually have with movies, is that Rocket let him live.
He… did a whole bunch of genocides. He did a genocide, like, 20 minutes ago. He’s in the middle of talking about how he wants to continue doing them.
Morally, it is okay.
That’s always gonna be a problem with this kind of franchise continuity... plans inevitably change in the years between movies, but fans will yell if you just pretend dangling plot hooks didn’t happen at all because someone decided to go in a different direction.One big criticism, or quibble really, is that Adam Warlock felt just kind of... there. He could be removed from the movie and nearly nothing would be lost, it's like he's only there because he was in the post-credits scene of Vol 2.