Don't worry, I'm sure he'll revamp this out of continuity in his non-apology letter.
Welcome to Talking Time's third iteration! If you would like to register for an account, or have already registered but have not yet been confirmed, please read the following:
Once you have completed these steps, Moderation Staff will be able to get your account approved.
I sort of understand why writers do it, but I get a little annoyed when they interpret the concept of "Anti-Life" as "death and destruction". Kirby's original concept was that it meant the complete lack of free will, and to be subservient to whoever had the Anti-Life Equation. Which I think is a more interesting concept than the tired old "a cosmic force of absolute destruction" or something like that. Still, with a name like that, I understand that it can be an easy mistake to make.The "zombies with a twist" concept is that they are all infected with "anti-life", so they are less "brains!" zombies and more "I will do anything to cause as much death as possible" zombies.
I'm no fan of the zombie genre (I don't hate it, I'm just not really drawn to it on its own), but this was pretty good.As much as I love Tom Taylor, and his particular knack for Bad Timelines, I was born completely disinterested in zombies.
Anti-Life as a monkey's paw, that I can get behind!I really liked how Walter Simonson merged the two concepts together in his Orion run (leave it to Simonson to be the only person to really get what Kirby was going for; towards the end Orion gets control of Anti-Life and tries to use it to make the universe a better place, but the nature of Anti-Life is such that it's completely incapable of performing a good act; and a demand for nobody in the universe to harm one another leads to countless suicides when people are trying to prevent themselves from even accidentally harming someone else (cars speeding off the road to avoid hitting a squirrel, that kind of thing).