Welcome to Talking Time's third iteration! If you would like to register for an account, or have already registered but have not yet been confirmed, please read the following:
Once you have completed these steps, Moderation Staff will be able to get your account approved.
When you put it that way, sure. But I think the writers either weren’t that creative or just wrote themselves into a corner.I'm not sure if the reasoning of "you would sacrifice yourself to save the entire frickin' galaxy" is the most compelling way to convince someone you're from the future
The easiest way of convincing someone you’re you is by telling them something they shouldn’t know, and couldn’t be easily looked up. Something very private. But that works 1-on-1, and it would be weird/bad to out someone’s deepest secrets in front of an audience.
I think a lot of your criticisms are fine/valid Mothra, but I'm still enjoying the show. A lot of the things you criticize the show over are things the show very clearly has no interest in doing. So for me it just feels weird to demerit a show for not being a thing it never wanted to be to begin with.
I kinda approach Disco like a Marvel movie, you know? It's a show that has really good production values, awe-inspiring set-pieces, and is generally pretty fun. If you wanted to start nitpicking it on source material accuracy, or things like plot holes, or are expecting prestige-TV-tier writing, you're gonna have a bad time, but most people don't go to Marvel movies for that - and they probably shouldn't for Disco either.What would be the main areas where Disco excels, in your opinion?
If I'm being honest, this was probably the weakest season of the show. But it had some pretty good moments along the way, and I genuinely enjoyed the final episode a lot. It's no All Good Things, but of the 8 discrete Star Trek shows that have had series finales, I'd say it solidly ranks 4th among those.This season was kinda weak, but I very much like the last episode. Also... Cronenberg... Haha
As much as I like Michael, I think the show would have been better off being the Saru-show. At least in terms of letting the most interesting person/best acting on the show be the main focus. I think... that's probably the true folly of having Discovery be the Michael Burnham show. I like the character and the actress, but it's kind of distracting when the best actor isn't the main character. Also, Michael isn't the most interesting character in the world either. She's kinda bland like Kirk. Kirk works because he was always put into interesting situations to see him react to. But there just isn't much to work with as an inherently interesting character. There's a reason why shows like TNG leaned heavily on telling Data-stories, or DS9 told a lot of Kira-stories, or VOY told a lot of Doctor or Seven stories. Because the premise of those characters are genuinely interesting and fertile ground for the writers to explore a lot of great ideas that a kinda bland-Captain doesn't get to.Ultimately, I'll remember this show for the cool spore network idea and Doug Jones' Saru, one of the most Star Trek characters the franchise has ever made.
The shaky cam really killed me in the first half of the episode. Which seemed like a very intentional director's direction. To have the space battles give a visual sense of the chaos that was happening? Because later in the episode when they wanted to portray calmness, the camera was ultra still. I still hate shaky cam though. I find it annoying. I don't need the immersion it is trying to create. I would rather have perfect observation.Fully jokerfied by the way the camera does not stop shaking for this entire episode, even in scenes of just regular dialogue between two characters.
I read that as she has no loyalty to them, and further actually hates them for what they did to her husband, and still sees them as a threat.Obsessed with the one surviving breen in here, who gets in a big Star Trek fight with Michael, gets sucked into the void, RETURNS, continues to battle her - so dedicated is this man - and is immediately gunned down by Moll (???) despite the fact that he was utterly loyal to her and would've helped her fight Michael. Why did she kill him? Because he's an alien? Not explained.
To summarize, Moll ordered this guy to go into the mystery box, which he did without question, then she followed him in, watching him valiantly battle her enemy, then shot him to death before he could finished her off.
If I had to guess, the implication is that the space magic would have let one Breen faction gain dominance over the rest, and then the unified Breen just laying waste with superior fire power.It's a bit strange how the original assumption about the Progenitors was that their technology could seed the galaxy, because that's all that's known about them, but then for the whole season they speak about the tech as this mysterious thing that could do anything. When they do get a straight answer here, the Progenitor hologram says that it does indeed do what they would expect it to: It clones things. Not super clear on how this led to the Federation's destruction in that other timeline aw fuck its
I know it was member-berries, but I didn't really mind. In fact, I kinda liked what it implied about Daniels -- that some of his time-adventures led him into direct contact with those other characters. I kinda liked the Temporal Cold War :\Kovich owning Sisko's baseball and La Forge's visor are the kind of memerberries that Discovery thinks the audience wants, but in-universe is like, so this time traveller jagoff from Enterprise's worst Burman storyline went back in time and stole important, meaningful items from these people, because he wanted to collect them like funko pops? Should Sisko's baseball be with like, Jake, or Jake's descendents? Or Kira or Sisko?
Because time travel at that point in the timeline is hyper-illegal.Also why didn't Daniels just time travel Zora/Disco there if all that was neede was for Craft to be rescued? aw fuck it