My guess that my husband would like and was definitely correct. I made that last post before he had seen any trailers for the Netflix version or was even aware of The Sandman in any way. I showed him the trailer and then we finished all the episodes in 2 days, including the adaptations of The Dream of a Thousand Cats and Calliope that came out yesterday. So, anecdotally, I'd say it's a huge success in allowing people who don't like reading comics to experience this material.
Beyond that, I came away with it much more positively than the word of mouth/reviews/clips that made me think it would be just serviceable. If you read comics at all, I would definitely say to read the comics. But if you don't or already have, this is definitely worth watching on its ow merits. The casting is very strong, and they did an admirable job reworking these issues, which require a lot of work because this is the period where The Sandman is most tied into DC superheroes/villains that the adaptation (correctly, in my opinion) just cuts out.
The casting is superb. The whole show would be a joke without a perfect Dream, and they nailed it. I found Patton Oswald a bit too much like 2020s punch-up dialogue at times in his first appearances, but he and the writing team seemed to pull back on that as Matthew became more of a regular. That and the opening voiceover in the first episode feel a bit like studio notes (whether or not they are), but other than that I was largely impressed by the show's restraint at not overexplaining.
I also appreciated the show's willingness to lean into standalone episodes and the tendency of the source material to function something like an 24/7 that are part of the narrative but functionally standalone and with adaptations of Calliope. I worried that they might have to make it more explicitly cliffhanger-y for Netflix, but they've really let them keep the show loose and baggy, to its benefit.
This show is good enough that it will be a real loss if they aren't allowed to just adapt the rest of the source material with more or less this degree of quality and pacing. Most agree that this is the weakest part of the comic, and I'm excited for them to get to the better stuff.
Beyond that, I came away with it much more positively than the word of mouth/reviews/clips that made me think it would be just serviceable. If you read comics at all, I would definitely say to read the comics. But if you don't or already have, this is definitely worth watching on its ow merits. The casting is very strong, and they did an admirable job reworking these issues, which require a lot of work because this is the period where The Sandman is most tied into DC superheroes/villains that the adaptation (correctly, in my opinion) just cuts out.
The casting is superb. The whole show would be a joke without a perfect Dream, and they nailed it. I found Patton Oswald a bit too much like 2020s punch-up dialogue at times in his first appearances, but he and the writing team seemed to pull back on that as Matthew became more of a regular. That and the opening voiceover in the first episode feel a bit like studio notes (whether or not they are), but other than that I was largely impressed by the show's restraint at not overexplaining.
I also appreciated the show's willingness to lean into standalone episodes and the tendency of the source material to function something like an 24/7 that are part of the narrative but functionally standalone and with adaptations of Calliope. I worried that they might have to make it more explicitly cliffhanger-y for Netflix, but they've really let them keep the show loose and baggy, to its benefit.
This show is good enough that it will be a real loss if they aren't allowed to just adapt the rest of the source material with more or less this degree of quality and pacing. Most agree that this is the weakest part of the comic, and I'm excited for them to get to the better stuff.