Annnnd finished the game.
Act 2: Boy, that feeling of "Oh fuck I don't have the right person do I who actually did it" really only gets much worse in act 2, doesn't it? I ended up sending them after Brother Guy because I had the most, and most damning, evidence against him, but I was never sure that he did it unlike in Act I where I was pretty confident that the prior did it what with the hidden murder weapon.
The end of the act felt a bit forced, what with Andreas dying to save the books. I almost wondered if it was because I had the bookworm background, which might actually fit, but I know it happens regardless of background and it didn't make sense to my friend who's playing alongside me.
Act 3: I was really surprised when I got to play Magdalene, but I really liked it and liked her as a protagonist. Her first background/personality trait being based on the book you give her as Andreas was such a brilliant little piece of design. I picked bookkeeping, haggling and polyglot to round her out as a strong-willed intellectual, and played her as such. I really liked seeing how everyone in the village had grown and changed, even more after this time skip than the earlier 7-year one. (I was especially happy for Matilda and Wojslav, and I was happy that I got the blacksmith to go find the girl and get married.) For the mural, I went secular and depicted the human sacrifice, then the Bavarians finding the ruins, then Otto giving a speech.
As for the ending, (SERIOUSLY, SPOILERS) I called the true culprit back in act II after Andreas found the book and remarked it must have come from a different abbey, and then Thomas said that he and Amalie had come from a different place shortly thereafter. I didn't finger Amalie as the note-writer though, I thought it was just Thomas top to bottom. As for his motivation, I feel like I picked up on that way early, back in Act I. Someone told the pagan story around the same time as I heard about saints moritz and satia, and I was like "oh, that's the same story. They're obviously all different versions of each other," which the Roman version only reaffirmed. Heck, there were even dialog choices along the way that had your character say "Oh, maybe they're different retellings of the same myth." So the idea that the connection to the saints was Thomas's motivation rang really hollow to me, because it seemed so obvious. I also wish I got more payoff for telling the people about the truth of the history, but it wasn't touched on.
One thing I wasn't clear about (still huge ending spoilers): Was Thomas actually the murderer in acts I and II, and all the suspects were innocent? Or was the idea that the manipulations were successful and one of the culprits really did murder the Baron and Otto? The game gives you the strong sense that maybe the people you get killed are innocent, but I wasn't sure if it was just making it realistically vague and making you live with the consequences, or if the idea is always that you got two innocent people killed.
Anyway, very good game. I'm still toying with another playthrough with completely different background to see how differently things play out. I'm pretty sure that like in most adventure games, the main beats won't really change, but it might be fun to see all the different dialog options and see how differently my investigations and routes play out.