So, I rolled credits on Xenoblade X Definitive Edition tonight. I've previously played the first game back when it came out on the Wii (in North America, so 2 years or so after it really first came out), but my memory of it is spotty at best. I enjoyed it, but didn't get XBX when it was new due to not having a Wii U, and then skipped 2 and 3 because I'd already missed a game in the series, and especially after XB1's Switch port came out I figured X was bound to get the same treatment sooner or later. So now that it has, I played it and I loved it, so much so that even before beating it I went ahead and ordered the rest of the series, including XB1 Definitive Edition.
I have not played the new epilogue in XBXDE, and I understand XB1DE also has a new epilogue, while 2 and 3 have DLC that extends their stories. At this point, having played the non-DE version of XB1 and not yet played XBXDE's new content, I've experienced what I have of the series - or at least the story - in release order. If I were to continue like that, I'd play XB2 and its DLC, then XB1DE and its epilogue, then XB3 + DLC, then come back to XBXDE and play the epilogue. Does playing in that order make sense, or should I just do the XBX epilogue now while the game is still fresh in my mind, and play the numbered series afterward? Or something else? I'm thinking mainly in terms of getting as much as possible out of the stories, since seeing the epic sci-fi series that Tetsuya Takahashi has been trying to make for 30 years or so finally coming to fruition is a big part of my motivation for playing them. The gameplay is also important, but honestly I think I'm going to have to brace myself for a downgrade in that department no matter which game I play next, since it's hard to imagine that going from a game where you can stomp around in a giant robot and eventually fly around in it as well to one where you can't do that would feel like anything but. Still, I'd rather see the series evolve as I go through it, so if XB1DE iterates on gameplay stuff that was introduced in XB2, that would make me more inclined to play in release order, but if XB1DE still plays more or less like the Wii game, I'd be more inclined to play in numerical order.
I have not played the new epilogue in XBXDE, and I understand XB1DE also has a new epilogue, while 2 and 3 have DLC that extends their stories. At this point, having played the non-DE version of XB1 and not yet played XBXDE's new content, I've experienced what I have of the series - or at least the story - in release order. If I were to continue like that, I'd play XB2 and its DLC, then XB1DE and its epilogue, then XB3 + DLC, then come back to XBXDE and play the epilogue. Does playing in that order make sense, or should I just do the XBX epilogue now while the game is still fresh in my mind, and play the numbered series afterward? Or something else? I'm thinking mainly in terms of getting as much as possible out of the stories, since seeing the epic sci-fi series that Tetsuya Takahashi has been trying to make for 30 years or so finally coming to fruition is a big part of my motivation for playing them. The gameplay is also important, but honestly I think I'm going to have to brace myself for a downgrade in that department no matter which game I play next, since it's hard to imagine that going from a game where you can stomp around in a giant robot and eventually fly around in it as well to one where you can't do that would feel like anything but. Still, I'd rather see the series evolve as I go through it, so if XB1DE iterates on gameplay stuff that was introduced in XB2, that would make me more inclined to play in release order, but if XB1DE still plays more or less like the Wii game, I'd be more inclined to play in numerical order.