Welcome to Talking Time's third iteration! If you would like to register for an account, or have already registered but have not yet been confirmed, please read the following:
Once you have completed these steps, Moderation Staff will be able to get your account approved.
This is another thing that goes back to Gene Roddenberry's Vision of the Future. The guy's philosophy and what he wanted out of the future was a very humanist worldview. And cloning is an evolutionary dead end/the removal of a sense of humanity from the human condition. It's wrong on a fundamental, ethical level to such a worldview.The other colony I liked less. They lost most of their colonists in a ship accident and survived on their world by cloning the remaining five. They need more cell tissue to continue producing offspring or else die out in a scant 50 years. They are portrayed as quite spooky and the cloning as unethical, and I never understood why.
More deeply, it's because her idea of romance is more human, versus Worf's Klingon conceptions. And that helps to outline an even deeper fear of incompatibility with her Klingon heritage.I think I understand. She wanted a stormy whirlwind romance, but Worf’s not about that.
Cliff Bole, who later directed Best of Both Worlds I & II among othersWhoever directed this did a good job.
I'm tangentially reminded of a 1980s SF novel where the main plot is a colony that needs to get more genetic material for their reproduction, in this case because they'rr a planet of all men. Ethan of Athos is sort of a sidestory in Lois McMaster Bujold's main SF series, but it's overall a great series and she deserves all those awards she's won over the years.The other colony I liked less. They lost most of their colonists in a ship accident and survived on their world by cloning the remaining five. They need more cell tissue to continue producing offspring or else die out in a scant 50 years. They are portrayed as quite spooky and the cloning as unethical, and I never understood why. Certainly, stealing tissue samples from the Enterprise crew as they do is immoral but why is cloning itself demonized? It’s okay to be creeped out at the idea but Riker & the Enterprise are vehemently opposed to it and they bust out the spooky music & everything. Like, do we want to sit and explore the ethics of transporter beaming??? I do not.
This is the weirdest attempt for the show to tackle abortion in pretty much any science fiction show. "We didn't consent to these FULLY GROWN HUMANS, so we are going to explode them with our space guns." And it's such a small part of the episode.As a viewer, you put two-and-two together instantaneously: Drop the first colony off with the second and bam, problem solved. The drama of the episode is completely manufactured because the clones claim that they engineered their society to eliminate sexual reproduction entirely in favor of cloning alone and that seems beyond dumb. I’m not going to sit and pretend I know anything about genetics but PURE HUMAN LOGIC tells me that either the cloning would have been a temporary solution until they figured out how to modify their genes, or that genetic mutations among enough descendants would eventually sort the situation out. Regardless, they should have no problem accepting the other colonists apart from internalized bigotry, which the episode touches upon.
This episode makes clear what kind of issues the producers and writers were having with the one-two punch of writer's strike and budget crunch. There are three plotlines going, and one of them is resolved in the first act! The Irish stereotypes are incredibly uncomfortable, to the point that Colm Meany hates this episode for it. Apparently the original concept was supposed to be a metaphor for American immigration policy, but it was lost in all the bullshit.ep 44 – Up the Long Ladder (★★★)
ep 47 – Peak Performance (★★★★★)