I thought the XenForo beta had that as the "froth" button. What happened to that?Is there a way to "like" posts? For when you agree with what someone said, but posting what amounts to "yeah, what they said" feels like it amounts to overkill?
Welcome to Talking Time's third iteration! If you would like to register for an account, or have already registered but have not yet been confirmed, please read the following:
Once you have completed these steps, Moderation Staff will be able to get your account approved.
I thought the XenForo beta had that as the "froth" button. What happened to that?Is there a way to "like" posts? For when you agree with what someone said, but posting what amounts to "yeah, what they said" feels like it amounts to overkill?
For what it's worth, most of the time people titled individual posts, it was to snark (usually accompanied with a silly reason for editing). This wasn't meant in derision.I don't think that's what either of us used them for, and I don't appreciate this.
Is there a way to "like" posts? For when you agree with what someone said, but posting what amounts to "yeah, what they said" feels like it amounts to overkill?
This was a temporary measure, re-skinning "likes" until it was decided what to do with them. What was decided was to remove them. If people have an opinion on that, please share it elsewhere, as it will massively derail this thread, given that prior discussions about it have always been massive, as the userbase seems split right down the middle, and some folks on both sides feel very strongly about it.I thought the XenForo beta had that as the "froth" button. What happened to that?
I don't agree. I used the same forum as both of you, and this is not consistent with how I saw them used, and certainly not how I used them. And the "you" certainly made it seem personal. But it's ultimately academic; we can't do it, and Bongo apologized, which I appreciate and accept.For what it's worth, most of the time people titled individual posts, it was to snark (usually accompanied with a silly reason for editing). This wasn't meant in derision.
Although the feature exists, this was put to a vote and as a result, it was decided to disable it. If it's desired to continue the discussion, please make a new thread for it.Is there a way to "like" posts? For when you agree with what someone said, but posting what amounts to "yeah, what they said" feels like it amounts to overkill?
If you click on it, a window pops up to ask what you're reporting. Unless you accidentally fill that in and hit submit, you're fine.
Do not implement likes or an equivalent function, please. It's been a horrible idea on every forum and social platform that I've seen it on, and fosters awful, ostracizing behaviour in the community without exception.
Is this better?
I feel like it would be fine as long as people can opt out of getting notifications from it.
The neutral Froth Bird was only being used untilI found the setting to remove it entirely. As Bongo said, votes were against it.
I am personally vehemently against “like” functions. Popularity contests (intended or not) are never fun for the inevitable losers. Instead my personal goal is to keep uplifting less heard voices.
"Likes", no. But reaction images are so much fun in discord; I'd love for them to be implemented here.
ty; now how do i stop auto-watching threads when replying?Is this what you're looking for? https://absolutelynot.talking-time.net/index.php?watched/threads