Simpsley
Patricia Highsmith was a famous writer of thrillers who created such classics as Strangers on a Train. But one of the more famous creations was that of Tom Ripley, the antihero opportunist who was willing to resort to murder to ensure he had a comfortable life. That said, he isn't someone who kills because he likes it; he kills people who either get in his way as he comes up with new scams to keep him both a step ahead of the law and in a comfortable life where he may have the resources to pursue his passions. In many way, Ripley was the precursor to the antihero boom that pervaded TV in the 2000s-2010s. Though there are still TV series with antiheroes, it kind of has gone away and it feels like more empathetic series are more en vogue now, particularly due to how kind of awful things are right now. But recently there was a much lauded Ripley mini-series covering the first book, the Talented Mr. Ripley, as the title character ingratiates himself into the life of a trust fund baby and decides to kill him when he attempts to abandon him. I remember reading the book for university and was kind of floored that the character, rather than getting a comeuppance, wins out through his cleverness.
In this episode, a parody of the Ripley TV mini-series, Marge Bouvier is a lowly scam artist who catches wind of millionaire Agnes Skinner complaining about her son, now living the high life in Italy on her dime. Marge pretends to be an old school chum and gets Agnes to send her to convince Skinner to come home when her real plan is to live the high life along with him. The plan works but it gets in the way of Homer Simpsley, who is similarly mooching off of Skinner (and is also attracted to him). The two are rivals for Skinner's attention but when Homer accidentally kills Skinner, Marge and Homer realize they are in the same boat; they just lost their meal ticket. However, the two come up with a plan: Homer can disguise himself as Skinner, who many people in the area don't know that well, and Marge can pull off perfect forgeries. The plan works but soon Skinner's friend Chalmers figures out their scheme, only to be murdered by Marge. This gets the attention of the police and it seems like Homer is going to crack but he doesn't and the two are released. Homer reveals his love for Marge is what saved them and it seems like all is well. But during a boat trip, Marge murders Homer... only to find Homer successfully poisoned Marge's drink earlier, causing the two to die together.
I think it makes sense that the stories the show is deciding to make Disney+ exclusives non-canonical stories. Not that canon is particularly sacred in Simpsons World but I think the non-canon are fun little playgrounds for the show to experiment. It does seem like an odd thing to build an episode around. Not that Ripley, the book series and mini-series doesn't deserve it (I loved that mini-series) but while it got acclaim upon release, its not something people are still talking about that much. I suspect part of it is simply that a) it is a classic timeless story that has been retold (there have been many adaptations of the first book in the series) and b) I suspect writer Cesar Mazariegos is somewhat passionate about it.
That doesn't mean it makes for a good episode. I think Mazariegos is one the the show's current strongest writers but this is just a fun, OK episode. I think he is also having fun changing the structure, essentially making both Marge AND Homer Ripley (as well as merging Homer with the character of Freddie, who is also Chalmers and merging Marge with the character of... Marge). I think all of this merging and mixing of characters actually works very well and is one of the stronger parts of the episode, at least as far as being a clever adaptation. The episode is also trying to be stylish like the mini-series and works pretty well on a technical level. For the show's flaws in it's later years, it still tends to try to look impressive.
And I have no problems per se with the episode except nothing leaps out as laugh out loud hilarious, nor can it quite ape the genuine tension of the story, making us tense for when the antihero might finally get caught. It is interesting to actually have, if not a happy ending, a "the bad guy gets what's coming to them", which is somewhat antithetical to the thrill of watching Ripley wriggle out of another trap or sticky situation. If anything, these kinds of episodes feel like the actors are getting to have fun being a little different. I suspect Kavner enjoys having Marge in the villain role, though it's pretty old ground for Castellaneta. Still, as episodes go, it's a fun but forgettable watch. I feel like the last exclusive I reviewed both has more strengths and weaknesses while this one, despite being a solid production, feels kind of just a nice, even ride.