Johnny Unusual
(He/Him)
Ritz Bits
The Product: Ritz is the buttery cracker that... it's a cracker. I Ritz isn't a "default" but it's very close to it. Very good, though. Ritz Bits are said cracker in the form of a small sandwich cookie. Cheese and peanut butter are their main flavour. This is specifically Ritz Bits s'mores. It kind of muddies the waters because the cracker part is not a graham cracker instead of a Ritz cracker.
Also, how come Ritz Bits instead of Ritz Bitz? Seems like a slam dunk.
The commercial:
Is it... The Simpsons?
Yeah, it's about ridiculous lengths for gluttony. I feel like even by Simpsons gluttony logic, though, Comic Book Guy isn't going this far for crackers.
Did it Make the Product/Brand Look Good?
I guess. It's weird to see what I must assume is a product aimed for gradeschoolers with a Simpsons ad in the 2000s. The early 90s, which is ironically when the show was considered an infant terrible in pop culture, feels like when they were pushing the Simpsons onto kids more. I guess I could have mentioned that in the sugary cereal but I'm so candy-brained I forgot to clock as something in the kids demographic. But more specifically, this is in little baggies, perfect for taking to school. No teacher would be upset but this feels like the cusp of when the times a grade schooler would be into the Simpsons comes to an end.
Overall
A pretty blah one and not even because Comic Book Guy has been way overused. Really feels like no one is trying here. I feel like this was a Butterfinger ad that never got used and was repurposed.
Here's a Comment
The Product: Ritz is the buttery cracker that... it's a cracker. I Ritz isn't a "default" but it's very close to it. Very good, though. Ritz Bits are said cracker in the form of a small sandwich cookie. Cheese and peanut butter are their main flavour. This is specifically Ritz Bits s'mores. It kind of muddies the waters because the cracker part is not a graham cracker instead of a Ritz cracker.
Also, how come Ritz Bits instead of Ritz Bitz? Seems like a slam dunk.
The commercial:
Yeah, it's about ridiculous lengths for gluttony. I feel like even by Simpsons gluttony logic, though, Comic Book Guy isn't going this far for crackers.
Did it Make the Product/Brand Look Good?
I guess. It's weird to see what I must assume is a product aimed for gradeschoolers with a Simpsons ad in the 2000s. The early 90s, which is ironically when the show was considered an infant terrible in pop culture, feels like when they were pushing the Simpsons onto kids more. I guess I could have mentioned that in the sugary cereal but I'm so candy-brained I forgot to clock as something in the kids demographic. But more specifically, this is in little baggies, perfect for taking to school. No teacher would be upset but this feels like the cusp of when the times a grade schooler would be into the Simpsons comes to an end.
Overall
A pretty blah one and not even because Comic Book Guy has been way overused. Really feels like no one is trying here. I feel like this was a Butterfinger ad that never got used and was repurposed.
Here's a Comment
Thanks. This clears up so much.He meant the whole box including its contents.