The Return of Talking Time

Go Back   The Return of Talking Time > Talking about media > Talking about meatspace games

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-01-2017, 10:03 AM
Mogri's Avatar
Mogri Mogri is offline
Yes, let's feast!
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 14,202
Default M41: Mafia of the Multiverse


Previously...

After their fierce battle with La Capitán that spanned time and space, our heroes were ready for a little downtime. But Baron Blade had other plans -- he's up to his old tricks again. Can the Sentinels stop Baron Blade from activating his TerraLunar Impulsion Beam, or should we start investing in lunar real estate?

Baron Blade plays Devious Disruption!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Devious Disruption
Once per night, one hero target cannot use powers.
(To balance out this setup overly favoring the town, Baron Blade is being given a roleblock power. If he targets The Visionary or her partner, the private chat will be suspended during the following day.)

In this Issue:
  • dtsund
  • Egarwaen
  • Falselogic
  • Gerad
  • Johnny Unusual
  • Rufferto
  • Taeryn
  • Trar
  • aturtledoesbite

Editor's Notes

Please make sure your votes are bolded and on their own line. I will probably miss them otherwise.

Day ends in 72 hours.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-01-2017, 10:24 AM
aturtledoesbite's Avatar
aturtledoesbite aturtledoesbite is offline
hi there
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Lafayette, LA
Posts: 14,937
Default

HOORAY IT'S A MAFIA

...i forgot how to play mafia
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-01-2017, 10:29 AM
Egarwaen's Avatar
Egarwaen Egarwaen is offline
Inherently Stealthy
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Sebastopol, CA
Posts: 13,501
Default

We all forget how to play mafia.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-01-2017, 12:23 PM
Falselogic's Avatar
Falselogic Falselogic is online now
Threadcromantosaurus Rex
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: California
Posts: 29,354
Default This is the last digimon pic I will ever post.

This is where I would normally post a pokemon picture.

But! The old meta is dead. So long live the new meta!



(the new meta is me posting digimon)

((OMG! These things look so fucking dumb))

Alright, everyone time to check in!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-01-2017, 02:20 PM
Gerad's Avatar
Gerad Gerad is offline
Holy Swine
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 6,362
Default

Hello! I'm a good guy!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-01-2017, 04:13 PM
Rufferto's Avatar
Rufferto Rufferto is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,173
Default

Checking in.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-01-2017, 06:20 PM
Taeryn's Avatar
Taeryn Taeryn is offline
-ryn
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: The Old Dominion
Posts: 2,401
Default

I think we should all just be friends.

Super Friends

(I don't know anything about comic books.)
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-01-2017, 07:10 PM
Johnny Unusual's Avatar
Johnny Unusual Johnny Unusual is offline
Man of Tomorrow Afternoon
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Fredericton, New Brunswick
Posts: 4,422
Default

Yo!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taeryn View Post
I think we should all just be friends.

Super Friends
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-01-2017, 07:26 PM
Falselogic's Avatar
Falselogic Falselogic is online now
Threadcromantosaurus Rex
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: California
Posts: 29,354
Default

Time to check in dtsund and Trar
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-01-2017, 07:28 PM
Gerad's Avatar
Gerad Gerad is offline
Holy Swine
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 6,362
Default

From the pitch, it looks like:

1 inspector
1 chatter
5 town

1 role-blocker
1 mafia

is a reasonable assumption for how the game is laid out. So we've got to find a supervillain by day 3 or we're done for, the world ends, etc.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-01-2017, 07:29 PM
Falselogic's Avatar
Falselogic Falselogic is online now
Threadcromantosaurus Rex
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: California
Posts: 29,354
Default

In fact I think we should all be talking a little more? The only way to win this game is make good calls on our votes and the only way to make good calls is to have something to judge.

So time to start talking folks! Let's find some scum!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-01-2017, 07:47 PM
aturtledoesbite's Avatar
aturtledoesbite aturtledoesbite is offline
hi there
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Lafayette, LA
Posts: 14,937
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Falselogic View Post
So time to start talking folks!
What'cha wanna talk about? I'm guessing not Pokemon or hot dogs...
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-01-2017, 08:05 PM
Gerad's Avatar
Gerad Gerad is offline
Holy Swine
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 6,362
Default

No dtsund and no Trar yet. Speak up, guys! Someone is going to get kryptonited!
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-01-2017, 08:09 PM
Falselogic's Avatar
Falselogic Falselogic is online now
Threadcromantosaurus Rex
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: California
Posts: 29,354
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gerad View Post
No dtsund and no Trar yet. Speak up, guys! Someone is going to get kryptonited!
No need to repeat the things I have already said!

I was thinking there was only one mafia though because Mogri mentioned that the Baron had a roleblock power.

Re-reading it though maybe there were not going to be any mafia powers?

I'm a little confused now.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-01-2017, 08:22 PM
Gerad's Avatar
Gerad Gerad is offline
Holy Swine
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 6,362
Default

Seems clear to me that there weren't going to be any mafia powers originally and now there are. Only 1 mafia doesn't make any sense numbers-wise; 3 wouldn't need a role-blocker to strengthen them, so it has to be 2.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 05-01-2017, 08:35 PM
Falselogic's Avatar
Falselogic Falselogic is online now
Threadcromantosaurus Rex
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: California
Posts: 29,354
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gerad View Post
Seems clear to me that there weren't going to be any mafia powers originally and now there are. Only 1 mafia doesn't make any sense numbers-wise; 3 wouldn't need a role-blocker to strengthen them, so it has to be 2.
That makes more sense. I think I just misread Mogri's original post and never went back to the other thread to check the rules.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 05-01-2017, 09:05 PM
Rufferto's Avatar
Rufferto Rufferto is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,173
Default

What do you guys think of Johnny? Seems pretty fishy to me.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 05-02-2017, 02:40 AM
dtsund's Avatar
dtsund dtsund is offline
Set phasers to hug
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 4,989
Default

Sorry I'm late; got my Switch and Breath of the Wild yesterday, checking anything on this forum kind of fell victim to that and I didn't know this had started.

And yeah, H=6 with this many players would be really rough for the town. I think this is an H=7 game.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 05-02-2017, 07:54 AM
Taeryn's Avatar
Taeryn Taeryn is offline
-ryn
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: The Old Dominion
Posts: 2,401
Default

I actually thought the same as FL from reading Mogri's pitch, but I don't know what H=6 or H=7 means.

I do see the point that 1 mafia and 8 town and two of them powered sounds unfair on its face.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 05-02-2017, 08:24 AM
Egarwaen's Avatar
Egarwaen Egarwaen is offline
Inherently Stealthy
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Sebastopol, CA
Posts: 13,501
Default

Hmm. Trar is still being quiet.

I'm still of the opinion that we should be killing the most quiet posters. If people aren't talking there's no way to catch scum out in lies.

The write-up does say that the setup overly favors the town... Does H=7 favor the town that strongly?
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 05-02-2017, 09:38 AM
Taeryn's Avatar
Taeryn Taeryn is offline
-ryn
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: The Old Dominion
Posts: 2,401
Default

I have always agreed with your line of thinking Egar, but I know you've gotten heat for it in the past.

My thinking has always been that objective #1 is try to catch mafia.
Catching people generally revolves around looking at what they've said especially as days go by and we know the affiliation of more former players.
As such, people who say nothing make the end game harder.

That being said, if we find someone who slips up on day 1 (we've done pretty decent at that on day 1s in the past) that's probably better than voting for someone simply because they forgot the game started. Thinking here being that even if leaving a quiet person makes end game harder, knowing the identity of a divisive target early can be better for the following day and maybe put us in a better position before the end game.

so, while I agree with your thinking in general principle, I consider it secondary. (the tertiary objective being a meta-objective of encouraging people to establish a base level of participation above zero in order to stay in the game, but given this is sort of the long view and has nothing to do with winning the game at hand, especially when we're playing less frequently, it tends not to play a factor in in game discussions as much as in post game discussions about making rules about minimum participation)
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 05-02-2017, 11:10 AM
Johnny Unusual's Avatar
Johnny Unusual Johnny Unusual is offline
Man of Tomorrow Afternoon
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Fredericton, New Brunswick
Posts: 4,422
Default

Yeah, I get wanting to target a silent player, but it is often due to neglect and busyness (or business. Or busy business). Still, I also understand someone, mafia or otherwise, to keep a low profile and avoiding the pointed finger (I myself have an instinct towards shyness in such games). But I think it is just the former, and while it is possible we have a lethargic mafia, I'm not sure if targeting him for doing nothing is the best option yet.

Plus, I think we still have another day and change.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 05-02-2017, 11:13 AM
aturtledoesbite's Avatar
aturtledoesbite aturtledoesbite is offline
hi there
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Lafayette, LA
Posts: 14,937
Default

We've got ~47 hours, based on when Mogri put up the post

So uh...is this sentinels of the multiverse thing a comic book? I have no idea.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 05-02-2017, 11:24 AM
Egarwaen's Avatar
Egarwaen Egarwaen is offline
Inherently Stealthy
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Sebastopol, CA
Posts: 13,501
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aturtledoesbite View Post
So uh...is this sentinels of the multiverse thing a comic book? I have no idea.
Let me tell you about the Sentinels of the Multiverse!

Sentinels of the Multiverse is a co-op card game. Each player has a hero deck, and are playing to defeat a villain deck, while dealing with additional complications from an environment deck. The villain and environment decks are "automatic", in that you don't need to make any decisions for them. There's a lot of technical language and complicated card interaction, so a lot of people prefer to play using the excellent digital app. Thematically, the game is about heroes and villains from a completely fictional line of comic books; quotes "from the comics" appear on the bottom of all cards. Baron Blade is the "starter" villain; he's got a few tricks that are overall pretty easy to bypass, including his Mobile Defense Platform (which makes him invincible until it's killed), mobs of goons, and he wins the game automatically if his trash gets too large.

I really do think that lynching someone who's not participating is a good day 1 move, even apart from any notion of the meta-game. Mafia want to attract as little notice as possible, and not posting or posting very little is a fantastic way to do that, as people are reluctant to lynch someone they think is busy or shy. And once we've let someone skate through on day 1, it gets harder and harder to justify not letting them continue to skate.

But Trar's still got some time to speak up, so... No need to rush things yet.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 05-02-2017, 11:27 AM
Johnny Unusual's Avatar
Johnny Unusual Johnny Unusual is offline
Man of Tomorrow Afternoon
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Fredericton, New Brunswick
Posts: 4,422
Default

I really need to play Sentinels. It sounds really up my alley.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 05-02-2017, 11:28 AM
Gerad's Avatar
Gerad Gerad is offline
Holy Swine
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 6,362
Default

My position is and always has been to lynch the suspicious people. Sometimes the talkers seem trustworthy and so the quieter ones are more suspicious, and sometimes it's the other way around. But you can't afford to just lynch the quiet people no matter what, or you're almost guaranteed to lose. Not all the quiet people will be mafia; look at all our history here for proof of that.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 05-02-2017, 11:31 AM
Falselogic's Avatar
Falselogic Falselogic is online now
Threadcromantosaurus Rex
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: California
Posts: 29,354
Default

A board game I think? I'm okay with lynching silent people when its the only option. But I don't know how effective it ever was at finding mafia.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 05-02-2017, 11:51 AM
aturtledoesbite's Avatar
aturtledoesbite aturtledoesbite is offline
hi there
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Lafayette, LA
Posts: 14,937
Default

I've never been a big fan of "lynch the quietest person", myself. Like, as circumstantial evidence to support a case, sure, but it's hardly decisive enough to warrant a vote on its own.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 05-02-2017, 12:15 PM
Rufferto's Avatar
Rufferto Rufferto is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,173
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Taeryn View Post
I have always agreed with your line of thinking Egar, but I know you've gotten heat for it in the past.

My thinking has always been that objective #1 is try to catch mafia.
Catching people generally revolves around looking at what they've said especially as days go by and we know the affiliation of more former players.
As such, people who say nothing make the end game harder.

That being said, if we find someone who slips up on day 1 (we've done pretty decent at that on day 1s in the past) that's probably better than voting for someone simply because they forgot the game started. Thinking here being that even if leaving a quiet person makes end game harder, knowing the identity of a divisive target early can be better for the following day and maybe put us in a better position before the end game.

so, while I agree with your thinking in general principle, I consider it secondary. (the tertiary objective being a meta-objective of encouraging people to establish a base level of participation above zero in order to stay in the game, but given this is sort of the long view and has nothing to do with winning the game at hand, especially when we're playing less frequently, it tends not to play a factor in in game discussions as much as in post game discussions about making rules about minimum participation)
Mmm... This post bugs me. Your first remark is to agree with Egarwaen on his stance, but the rest of the post basically refutes why we should prioritize killing quiet players. I also feel like you're trying to buddy up to Egarwaen here, e.g. "I always secretly agreed with you."
Not indicative of anything yet, but for everyone else, keep this in the back of your minds when you're thinking about the motivation behind Taeryn's posts.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 05-02-2017, 01:05 PM
Taeryn's Avatar
Taeryn Taeryn is offline
-ryn
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: The Old Dominion
Posts: 2,401
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rufferto View Post
Mmm... This post bugs me. Your first remark is to agree with Egarwaen on his stance, but the rest of the post basically refutes why we should prioritize killing quiet players. I also feel like you're trying to buddy up to Egarwaen here, e.g. "I always secretly agreed with you."
Not indicative of anything yet, but for everyone else, keep this in the back of your minds when you're thinking about the motivation behind Taeryn's posts.
Yeah, I knew this was coming almost as soon as I posted this. Fair enough that you suspect me for what I said. I don't think I'm agreeing and then disagreeing. I'm basically saying the same thing as Falselogic just said in a lot more words.

I am trying to buddy up to Egarwaen. I'm trying to buddy up to everyone so you will like me and not throw me out of the game. Also, I want people to have good experiences playing mafia so we can play more of it in the future.

I think the discussion has been helpful to see where everyone comes from. We never all agree on this but I think we're not far off from each other.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Your posts ©you, 2007